<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Baidu&#8217;s Problems: The Other Side of the Equation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chinavortex.com/2008/12/baidus-problems-side-equation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chinavortex.com/2008/12/baidus-problems-side-equation/</link>
	<description>China &#124; Business &#124; Economy &#124; Internet &#124; Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 00:49:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: How Baidu and Google China Ended 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.chinavortex.com/2008/12/baidus-problems-side-equation/comment-page-1/#comment-7660</link>
		<dc:creator>How Baidu and Google China Ended 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 05:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinavortex.com/?p=427#comment-7660</guid>
		<description>[...] slipped up again by allowing some unlicensed health-care companies to place top spot ads in its search [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] slipped up again by allowing some unlicensed health-care companies to place top spot ads in its search [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imagethief : How Baidu can dig its way out</title>
		<link>http://www.chinavortex.com/2008/12/baidus-problems-side-equation/comment-page-1/#comment-6324</link>
		<dc:creator>Imagethief : How Baidu can dig its way out</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 11:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinavortex.com/?p=427#comment-6324</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: China Journal : Best of the China Blogs: December 5</title>
		<link>http://www.chinavortex.com/2008/12/baidus-problems-side-equation/comment-page-1/#comment-6305</link>
		<dc:creator>China Journal : Best of the China Blogs: December 5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 02:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinavortex.com/?p=427#comment-6305</guid>
		<description>[...] victim of its own success? Another take on Baidu’s recent public relations troubles. [China [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] victim of its own success? Another take on Baidu’s recent public relations troubles. [China [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thijs (Shenzhen)</title>
		<link>http://www.chinavortex.com/2008/12/baidus-problems-side-equation/comment-page-1/#comment-6299</link>
		<dc:creator>Thijs (Shenzhen)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 15:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinavortex.com/?p=427#comment-6299</guid>
		<description>Interesting post, I didn&#039;t know the situation was so bad for Baidu.How come Google can earn so much money with doing honest business then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post, I didn&#8217;t know the situation was so bad for Baidu.How come Google can earn so much money with doing honest business then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pieter-Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.chinavortex.com/2008/12/baidus-problems-side-equation/comment-page-1/#comment-6292</link>
		<dc:creator>Pieter-Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 08:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinavortex.com/?p=427#comment-6292</guid>
		<description>Great post! spot on, I agree and think Robin Li wil not be able to clean up the place rigorously enough.

&#039;Hoping that the crisis is soon forgotten&#039;
I think the behaviour of the users is determining the choices of advertisers in this case. So the question is: forgotten by who, users or advertisers? I havent read anything on the reaction of users, is the inexperienced majority remembering this? If so, will they actually change search behaviour and ultimately pick G.cn??

A lot of questions, curious how this will develop!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post! spot on, I agree and think Robin Li wil not be able to clean up the place rigorously enough.</p>
<p>&#8216;Hoping that the crisis is soon forgotten&#8217;<br />
I think the behaviour of the users is determining the choices of advertisers in this case. So the question is: forgotten by who, users or advertisers? I havent read anything on the reaction of users, is the inexperienced majority remembering this? If so, will they actually change search behaviour and ultimately pick G.cn??</p>
<p>A lot of questions, curious how this will develop!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.299 seconds -->
