<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s Wrong with C2C?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chinavortex.com/2008/05/whats-wrong-with-c2c/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chinavortex.com/2008/05/whats-wrong-with-c2c/</link>
	<description>China &#124; Business &#124; Economy &#124; Internet &#124; Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 00:49:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: What&#8217;s The Meaning of SoftBank&#8217;s Investment in Oak Pacific? : China Web2.0 Review</title>
		<link>http://www.chinavortex.com/2008/05/whats-wrong-with-c2c/comment-page-1/#comment-1930</link>
		<dc:creator>What&#8217;s The Meaning of SoftBank&#8217;s Investment in Oak Pacific? : China Web2.0 Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 17:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinavortex.com/?p=196#comment-1930</guid>
		<description>[...] to success as what Xiaonei did and proved by Softbank&#8217;s investment. Even though C2C is not as simple as it looks like, it is possible that more startups will hope they can find quick money from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to success as what Xiaonei did and proved by Softbank&#8217;s investment. Even though C2C is not as simple as it looks like, it is possible that more startups will hope they can find quick money from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaiser</title>
		<link>http://www.chinavortex.com/2008/05/whats-wrong-with-c2c/comment-page-1/#comment-1927</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaiser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 02:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinavortex.com/?p=196#comment-1927</guid>
		<description>Actually it was first published on VentureBeat: The TechCrunch story even cites that source in lede.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually it was first published on VentureBeat: The TechCrunch story even cites that source in lede.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.387 seconds -->
