<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When Worst-Case Scenarios Become Best-Case Scenarios</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chinavortex.com/2008/03/when-worst-case-scenarios-become-best-case-scenarios/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chinavortex.com/2008/03/when-worst-case-scenarios-become-best-case-scenarios/</link>
	<description>China &#124; Business &#124; Economy &#124; Internet &#124; Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Lam</title>
		<link>http://www.chinavortex.com/2008/03/when-worst-case-scenarios-become-best-case-scenarios/comment-page-1/#comment-1749</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Lam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinavortex.com/2008/03/when-worst-case-scenarios-become-best-case-scenarios/#comment-1749</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read about this report on Newscientist and I am reminded of it everytime I see a power plant in China. Though you can&#039;t say Kyoto Protocol is worthless, you have to wonder how much China&#039;s cheap energy will be costing the world in the long run. When you hear just the INCREASE alone is more than UK or Germany&#039;s current output, you have to really think twice about the effectiveness of Kyoto Protocol.

&quot;The researchers&#039; most conservative forecast predicts that by 2010, there will be an increase of 600 million metric tons of carbon emissions in China over the country&#039;s levels in 2000. This growth from China alone would dramatically overshadow the 116 million metric tons of carbon emissions reductions pledged by all the developed countries in the Kyoto Protocol.&quot;

&quot;...the projected annual increase in China alone over the next several years is greater than the current emissions produced by either Great Britain or Germany.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read about this report on Newscientist and I am reminded of it everytime I see a power plant in China. Though you can&#8217;t say Kyoto Protocol is worthless, you have to wonder how much China&#8217;s cheap energy will be costing the world in the long run. When you hear just the INCREASE alone is more than UK or Germany&#8217;s current output, you have to really think twice about the effectiveness of Kyoto Protocol.</p>
<p>&#8220;The researchers&#8217; most conservative forecast predicts that by 2010, there will be an increase of 600 million metric tons of carbon emissions in China over the country&#8217;s levels in 2000. This growth from China alone would dramatically overshadow the 116 million metric tons of carbon emissions reductions pledged by all the developed countries in the Kyoto Protocol.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;the projected annual increase in China alone over the next several years is greater than the current emissions produced by either Great Britain or Germany.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

