<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Working the Gray Areas in China</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chinavortex.com/2008/02/working-the-gray-areas-in-china/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chinavortex.com/2008/02/working-the-gray-areas-in-china/</link>
	<description>China &#124; Business &#124; Economy &#124; Internet &#124; Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: corbett</title>
		<link>http://www.chinavortex.com/2008/02/working-the-gray-areas-in-china/#comment-1491</link>
		<dc:creator>corbett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 17:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinavortex.com/2008/02/working-the-gray-areas-in-china/#comment-1491</guid>
		<description>There's another way of looking at this.
 
Do you stand to lose your own money, or someone else's?
In my experience, you cross more t's and dot more i's when your ass is on the line with someone else's money. When it's your own, you have more freedom to play in the gray areas. 

BTW, Paul, which son are you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s another way of looking at this.</p>
<p>Do you stand to lose your own <a title="money" href="http://www.chinavortex.com/tag/money/" >money</a>, or someone else&#8217;s?<br />
In my experience, you cross more t&#8217;s and dot more i&#8217;s when your ass is on the line with someone else&#8217;s money. When <a title="it" href="http://www.chinavortex.com/tag/it/" >it</a>&#8217;s your own, you have more freedom to play in the gray areas. </p>
<p>BTW, <a title="Paul" href="http://www.chinavortex.com/tag/paul/" >Paul</a>, which son are you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.chinavortex.com/2008/02/working-the-gray-areas-in-china/#comment-1485</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 05:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinavortex.com/2008/02/working-the-gray-areas-in-china/#comment-1485</guid>
		<description>This is not a uniquely Chinese phenomenon. Regulation is a reactive phenomenon in pretty much all markets. An industry or technology emerges. Its consequences are hard to foresee at first. Over time, as those consequences are discovered, regulation emerges to manage them.

The main differences here, it seems to me, are twofold. First, that China's emergence has led to this process unfolding at dramatic speed over the past two decades. Second, that China's opaque regulatory apparatus, combined with the government's explicit power over over business, can make the process seem quite arbitrary and dangerous. (Matters here often being settled by fiat rather than tested in court as they would be in the US.)

But Chinese entrepreneurs aren't doing anything differently from entrepreneurs in new industries elsewhere in terms of exploiting opportunities and risking that their models would survive the emergence of regulation. The American tech industry provides parallels. Napster was an entrepreneurial test case. The difference is that its fate was settled through commercial litigation rather than government intervention. Similarly, YouTube and the American video sharing sites are still learning what they can get away with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not a uniquely <a title="Chinese" href="http://www.chinavortex.com/tag/chinese/" >Chinese</a> phenomenon. Regulation is a reactive phenomenon in pretty much all markets. An industry or technology emerges. Its consequences are hard to foresee at first. Over time, as those consequences are discovered, regulation emerges to manage them.</p>
<p>The main differences here, it seems to me, are twofold. First, that <a title="China" href="http://www.chinavortex.com/tag/china/" >China</a>&#8217;s emergence has led to this process unfolding at dramatic speed over the past two decades. Second, that China&#8217;s opaque regulatory apparatus, combined with the government&#8217;s explicit power over over <a title="business" href="http://www.chinavortex.com/tag/business/" >business</a>, can make the process seem quite arbitrary and dangerous. (Matters here often being settled by fiat rather than tested in court as they would be in the US.)</p>
<p>But Chinese entrepreneurs aren&#8217;t doing anything differently from entrepreneurs in new industries elsewhere in terms of exploiting opportunities and risking that their models would survive the emergence of regulation. The American tech industry provides parallels. Napster was an entrepreneurial test case. The difference is that its fate was settled through commercial litigation rather than government intervention. Similarly, YouTube and the American video sharing sites are still learning what they can get away with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frank</title>
		<link>http://www.chinavortex.com/2008/02/working-the-gray-areas-in-china/#comment-1473</link>
		<dc:creator>frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 05:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinavortex.com/2008/02/working-the-gray-areas-in-china/#comment-1473</guid>
		<description>good article and i find it hard not to agree with it. One of the skills that I feel that good entrepreneurs have is an ability to sort of sense which rules they can bend and which they should stay adhere to. As one of my friends told me about learning in college.  "its not about learning as much as you can....its about learning what you can ignore."

i like your metaphor of the prodigal son. Here are some more hackneyed metaphors which seem apt as well.

better to beg for forgiveness than to ask for permission or better to die like a lion than to live like a sheep.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good article and i find <a title="it" href="http://www.chinavortex.com/tag/it/" >it</a> hard not to agree with it. One of the <a title="skills" href="http://www.chinavortex.com/tag/skills/" >skills</a> that I feel that good <a title="entrepreneurs" href="http://www.chinavortex.com/tag/entrepreneurs/" >entrepreneurs</a> have is an ability to sort of sense which rules they can bend and which they should stay adhere to. As one of my friends told me about learning in college.  &#8220;its not about learning as much as you can&#8230;.its about learning what you can ignore.&#8221;</p>
<p>i like your metaphor of the prodigal son. Here are some more hackneyed metaphors which seem apt as well.</p>
<p>better to beg for forgiveness than to ask for permission or better to die like a lion than to live like a sheep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 3.295 seconds -->
