• lansoprazole pharmacie dutasteride vente http://unit-tice.emn.fr/CACHE/well/index...
  • buying indesign uk buy sam 2010 access code price of quicken 2010 best buy paint shop pro http://www.fiabci-asiapacific.com/?indus... purchase windows xp licence key cheap office 2008 for mac teacher discount office 2007 discount windows 7 pro levitra retail price viagra no prescription http://www.journeeseconomie.org/index.ph...
      cialis otc buy prozac online no prescription viagra pack sample

    Investing in American Science and Technology

    One of my recurring themes is that Americans have become too good at consuming, down to the point of consuming their children’s futures through deficit spending, and have not done enough to invest in the future. This is an important legacy of the current Bush administration which has repeatedly mortgaged the future in order to achieve their short-term political goals.

    China has done a somewhat better job of investing in education and infrastructure; the recent snowstorms and transportation breakdowns in central and southern China have shown that even though large amounts have been spent, there is still a long road to go before China has a modern transport infrastructure which can serve the needs of its 1.3B citizens.

    At one time, Americans were respected worldwide for their ability to make things. Now, these capabilities have been largely outsourced. Instead, American politics is much more focused on fractious issues which have little or no substantive meaning, but are manufactured to capture air time on television or on the Internet. The result: an increasingly polarized society where people increasingly talk at each other, instead of to each other.

    For this reason, I was very pleased that a group of concerned Americans have set up a website to debate the future of science in the US, and the platforms of the respective presidential candidates on the issue.

    If you are concerned about the future of American science, then you should take a look at it.