<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Business and Social Context Isn&#8217;t Important; It&#8217;s Everything</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chinavortex.com/2008/02/business-and-social-context-isnt-important-its-everything/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chinavortex.com/2008/02/business-and-social-context-isnt-important-its-everything/</link>
	<description>China &#124; Business &#124; Economy &#124; Internet &#124; Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LarsW</title>
		<link>http://www.chinavortex.com/2008/02/business-and-social-context-isnt-important-its-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-1558</link>
		<dc:creator>LarsW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 21:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinavortex.com/2008/02/business-and-social-context-isnt-important-its-everything/#comment-1558</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re definitely right here, smart decisions can&#039;t be made outside of China etc... But I don&#039;t think handing your business over to a local team and then trusting them to take care of things will work either.

I&#039;ve seen that fail before, how quality and order erodes etc... China-Fade! 

You need to be here together with your local team, watch, learn and doing plenty of micromanagement. You&#039;ll need one of your top people living here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re definitely right here, smart decisions can&#8217;t be made outside of China etc&#8230; But I don&#8217;t think handing your business over to a local team and then trusting them to take care of things will work either.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen that fail before, how quality and order erodes etc&#8230; China-Fade! </p>
<p>You need to be here together with your local team, watch, learn and doing plenty of micromanagement. You&#8217;ll need one of your top people living here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: syz</title>
		<link>http://www.chinavortex.com/2008/02/business-and-social-context-isnt-important-its-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-1552</link>
		<dc:creator>syz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 01:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinavortex.com/2008/02/business-and-social-context-isnt-important-its-everything/#comment-1552</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
So why do so many US technology companies continue to try to second-guess and micromanage their China local management?
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Try: pure condescension. I hope my company is an exception, but somehow I doubt it, so please bear with the elaboration...

Under &quot;management by condescension,&quot; the benighted Chinese employees, in management&#039;s eyes, are hard workers and good people with a hopeless lack of understanding of modern business practices. Therefore, we bring in the enlightened management team from the home country (read: whoever we could coerce or cajole into a move to Beijing) to impart to them a small fraction of our vast business knowledge. Then every time our gross ignorance of the market, the local business practices, and the management of personnel leads to a conflagration, we smile kindly and say, &quot;ah, they just don&#039;t get it yet.&quot;

How did this condescension start?

That&#039;s a more interesting question. I don&#039;t think it&#039;s racism, in most cases, but just a complete lack of comprehension. It begins, of course, with a language barrier that prevents the foreign managers from communicating with most of the workforce. If you can&#039;t communicate with your people, you can hardly know what their capabilities are and aren&#039;t. 

Then when every bit of news comes filtered through one of the few English speakers on staff, it leads to a distorted view of reality at best. In the worst case, if one of them also happens to be the danwei idiot, then the communication disturbances become all-out anarchy. Not pretty.

But I surely agree that when all is powerpointed and presented to the governing committee back at home, it can all be attributed to
&lt;blockquote&gt;
“poor performance by local management”
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
So why do so many US technology companies continue to try to second-guess and micromanage their China local management?
</p></blockquote>
<p>Try: pure condescension. I hope my company is an exception, but somehow I doubt it, so please bear with the elaboration&#8230;</p>
<p>Under &#8220;management by condescension,&#8221; the benighted Chinese employees, in management&#8217;s eyes, are hard workers and good people with a hopeless lack of understanding of modern business practices. Therefore, we bring in the enlightened management team from the home country (read: whoever we could coerce or cajole into a move to Beijing) to impart to them a small fraction of our vast business knowledge. Then every time our gross ignorance of the market, the local business practices, and the management of personnel leads to a conflagration, we smile kindly and say, &#8220;ah, they just don&#8217;t get it yet.&#8221;</p>
<p>How did this condescension start?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a more interesting question. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s racism, in most cases, but just a complete lack of comprehension. It begins, of course, with a language barrier that prevents the foreign managers from communicating with most of the workforce. If you can&#8217;t communicate with your people, you can hardly know what their capabilities are and aren&#8217;t. </p>
<p>Then when every bit of news comes filtered through one of the few English speakers on staff, it leads to a distorted view of reality at best. In the worst case, if one of them also happens to be the danwei idiot, then the communication disturbances become all-out anarchy. Not pretty.</p>
<p>But I surely agree that when all is powerpointed and presented to the governing committee back at home, it can all be attributed to</p>
<blockquote><p>
“poor performance by local management”
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Managing The Dragon &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Top Ten China News Stories (02/21/08)</title>
		<link>http://www.chinavortex.com/2008/02/business-and-social-context-isnt-important-its-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-1536</link>
		<dc:creator>Managing The Dragon &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Top Ten China News Stories (02/21/08)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 03:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinavortex.com/2008/02/business-and-social-context-isnt-important-its-everything/#comment-1536</guid>
		<description>[...] Business and Social Context Isn’t Important; It’s Everything (China Vortex Blog) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Business and Social Context Isn’t Important; It’s Everything (China Vortex Blog) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

