clomid preis propecia generico in italia dysfonction erectile
    cialis prezzo migliore cialis vente en ligne viagra vervanger
http://www.ears.dmu.ac.uk/index.php?M=&N... buy cialis mc cialis where to buy
kamagra online sale ambien maximum dosage kamagra no prescription
  • achat viagra en ligne en france rapide achat cialis sur internet eriacta viagra confronto
  • farmaci kamagra vendita cialis generico italia acheter kamagra pharmacie
    foro cialis http://www.smwc.edu/?&sn=get&cat=346289&... preise viagra
    Twitter
    LinkedIn

    Risk Is In The Eyes of the Beholder Part I

    Africa map

    In the west, there is a whole industry called “risk consultancy”. Basically, this industry is built around informing large- and medium-sized corporations about risk. Originally, this was built around business risk and would answer questions like “How safe is it to invest $500M in an industrial diamond mine in the Congo (formerly Zaire)?” The consulting firm would then send practice consultants to the target country, where they would study sunk costs (including bribes which were never written about in the report, regulations, who was related to the president, political opposition, major competing firms, etc.) Most of these questions were positioned as questions which any board would ask the CEOs before they would greenlight an investment.

    Underlying all this is the belief, at least in west and among western corporations that “risk” is something which can be quantified and measured objectively.

    One of the big topics in the west now is China’s investments in Africa. What is fascinating about China’s investments in Africa is that while the amounts of money and people who go to Africa are huge, China really doesn’t have risk consultancies, and Chinese really have not yet started thinking in terms of quantifying risk in the ways western corporations have.

    So how have the Chinese judged risk so far, and will the present method change over time to something more akin to the western way of thinking? When it comes to Chinese investments in Africa, many of the early-stage investments were a part of Chinese foreign policy aimed at securing raw materials for manufacturing, and more importantly, energy sources. The typical model has been to find a country, build a new palace for the president and a new sports stadium to win over the people. This would help state-owned construction firms to gain a footing in the country, which were then quickly followed by Chinese logistics firms and wholesale distribution firms which would sell products to the local African population.

    Viewing the local African population as customers were one area where Chinese viewed Africa fundamentally differently from the west. While Beijing, Shanghai and the Chinese tier one and tier two cities are relatively modern, it is very easy to forget that when it comes to pervasive poverty, China is only 10-20 years removed from the levels of African poverty. Basically, Chinese companies know how to sell to poor people because they had lots of practice in China.

    When you are working from a low cost basis, there really is not a whole lot of need to measure risk because the only way to go is up. Remember, in China labor is still very cheap compared to the west, and the Chinese government is always interested in keeping people employed in the interests of social stability. On the other hand, when you have large risks but your investments are backed by the Chinese government, there is not a need to measure them either. But things get complicated when you are in the middle, and are a mid-sized Chinese company (US50M-1B) which is private and are looking at Africa, as many are now.

    Right now, the path many are taking is to send executives, management and staff wholesale to Africa, and basically telling them to figure things out on the ground. This is the Chinese version of “Let’s throw spaghetti at the wall and see what sticks” approach. But what happens when you don’t really have the protection of the Chinese government and local Chinese embassy, and the Africans start complaining that Chinese companies aren’t creating enough local jobs for local Africans? Obviously, these are the sorts of questions which are very complicated, since they include a social factor, in addition to the corporate and economic equation.

    Will the Chinese companies turn to the western risk consultancies? Not likely. First of all, they are too expensive by Chinese standards; Chinese management is still very price-sensitive and is not likely to be willing to spend the large amounts which these companies charge. Also, they are not likely to entrust this kind of sensitive information to an outside firm which may recirculate some of the data for a competitor. Most Chinese companies are very tightly held, and risk is whatever the CEO thinks it is at that moment in time.

    For western corporations which work from a high-cost basis, risk consulting is an item on “research” for executives, even though it may easily run into the millions of dollars.

    For the Chinese, that’s way too much…




    15 Responses to “Risk Is In The Eyes of the Beholder Part I”

    1. [...] AJ wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerpt [...]

    2. xThomas says:

      “Basically, Chinese companies know how to sell to poor people because they had lots of practice in China.” ahah It is totaly true !

      In the order hand, chineses companies must learn how to sell to rich people :) !

    3. Will says:

      Interesting post, Paul.

      I wonder if more than historical reasons are to blame. The US had its own experience with national penury in the Great Depression. Granted, that was three generations ago, while is only a generation or so removed from its most recent economic calamity and continues to have much more visible poverty.

      But I’d also see America’s habits as a product of our cold-war capitalism. We come from a society where debt has been actively marketed for at least forty years, and where it has thus become socially acceptable and a pillar of our consumer-driven economy.

      Given enough time, it seems likely to me that similar things could happen here. Credit card companies and banks are busy marketing debt in China now, within the limits set by the government. A long enough stretch of prosperity might make the bad old days seem more remote, no matter how long the chain of history. Wait and see what happens when generation that lived through the cultural revolution is gone. If China is still on an upward path then, I bet you attitudes toward debt and savings will have changed, at least among the prosperous.

    4. [...] Denlinger wrote about this at Chinavortex.com: In the west, there is a whole industry called “risk consultancy”…. Originally, this was [...]

    5. Jessie says:

      Jessie…

      Love the blog. Ive dugg you in my digg account for future reading!…

    6. Eric says:

      Eric…

      Nice article….

    7. Tom says:

      Tom…

      Good work. I am going to read some more on this….

    8. The Dynamics of Management Consulting…

      In a world where information travels as fast as the speed of light and businesses are launched and dissolve in the blink of an eye, managers in all sectors are seeking outside expertise or consultants to help them survive and thrive in today’s competi…

    9. Nice thought. Totally agree ! I’m trying myself to step in this field with Chinese companies working overseas in Asia and its a long, long way to go…

      Olivier Falcoz

    10. [...] the full post here This entry was written by Olivier Falcoz and posted on Monday 10 March 2008 at 21:21 and filed [...]

    11. china internet marketing…

    12. Kylen says:

      Kylen…

      I just wanted to say that the quality of your site is exceptional. On top of all that it really complements the content that is provided by your site….

    13. Investment Companies…

      Thanks for this post!…

    14. [...] the full post here This entry was written by Olivier Falcoz and posted on Tuesday 11 March 2008 at 17:52 and filed [...]