• http://pufr-editions.fr/?page=761444&pi=... adobe creative suite 6 oem inexpensive photoshp cs5
  • cheapest windows xp professional sp3 microsoft office 2013 buy now buy windows xp activation key microsoft access 2013 download buy adobe indesign for mac os x lion download download adobe photoshop elements 12 mac download ms office 2013 sp1 cost of office 2013 product key
    price of quicken 2010 buy visio 2010 premium office 2010 professional plus cheap
    http://depts.washington.edu/icutalk/?hos... buy visio 2010 standard http://depts.washington.edu/icutalk/?hos...
    buy 2013 ms access 
    cheapest onenote software 
    purchase microsoft office 2010 professional 
    Twitter
    LinkedIn

    Another Way To Develop Global Chinese Brands: Buy Google, Apple

    Over the past few years, one subject has dominated Chinese thinking on the government and enterprise levels: how to take Chinese brands global. During the runup to the Beijing Olympics in 2008, and then the Shanghai Expo in 2010, this subject will become even more popular, as China’s economic power grows and the US’s economic dominance gradually recedes.

    So far, the thinking is that Chinese companies, with some degree of Chinese government assistance, should buy leading US brands and manage them. This was the thinking, for example, behind Lenovo’s purchase of IBM’s money-losing PC division and the Thinkpad brand in 2004. It was also the thinking behind the aborted CNOOC purchase of Unocal, an offer which had to be withdrawn because of heavy US congressional pressure over security.

    Outright purchases of foreign companies, in the form of hostile takeovers and mergers rarely go well, even when the cultures of the two companies are close. When they are as far apart as Chinese and western companies, the odds are overwhelmingly stacked against success.

    Now there is renewed interest in buying western companies for yet another reason: the Chinese government is sitting on US$1.3 trillion in foreign exchange reserves, and with the dollar falling against the euro and other major currencies, there is strong pressure to invest this money in something else besides US dollars, which will continue to depreciate. In order to slow down this depreciation, the Chinese government has announced that it will establish a Chinese sovereign wealth fund to invest about US$200-300B in higher-yield investments. Within the past year, sovereign wealth funds have proliferated as foreign governments seek to diversify their foreign-exchange reserves out of US dollars, especially as the US subprime mortgage lending crisis has spread overseas.

    For the Chinese government, which likes to do great projects which it can then use in PR to the Chinese people, there is a fundamental bottleneck: there are not enough Chinese who have international experience managing global companies. And those who do have the skills usually decide to spend their time and effort in the private sector where their skills are more needed. In one article some time ago, Business Week claimed that China needed about 75,000 international executives while there are only 5,000 available.

    There is another problem with creating global brands: in most sectors, it takes an awful long time to create them. If you look at Toyota in the automobile sector, it has taken the company mostly since the period from 1945 to become established as a leading quality maker. When it comes to manufacturing, global brands are not made, they are earned on the basis of quality products.

    The place where brands have sprouted relatively quickly are in the computing and hi-tech sectors. Apple has been around since the 70s and has undergone a dramatic rebirth under the tutelage of its founder, Steve Jobs, who returned in 1997 after Apple’s acquisition of NeXT. Since his return, he has launched the iMac, iPod and now iPhone lines, all of which have won critical acclaim from users worldwide. Steve Jobs has shown that he is that rare type of executive, someone who learns from his mistakes and is passionate about creating excellent products. Now, even for dedicated Windows computer users, Apple’s products are something worth thinking seriously about. When it comes to evoking pure passion among users, there is no company like Apple. The way Apple has launched the iPhone globally has shown that it fully understands how to use the power of the Internet and the media to create global attraction for its new products at very little cost. On October 26, the company will launch its latest version of the OS X operating system, Leopard.

    The company’s success has been rewarded on Wall Street; the company now has a market cap of more than 148.2B and its shares are trading at $172.

    Another company which has succeeded in creating a global brand in a relatively short time is Google, which was founded on September 27, 1998. Google started as a technology company, and has morphed into a company which understands, and is now revolutionizing the media business. Coming from a very strong technology core base, they like to constantly talk about their technology, even though that is relatively unimportant backend stuff to most people. Very early on, Google figured out that as computing, and now mobile computing grew, more and more data would be accessed from online. The question was: “What was the economic/business models which would support it?” The answer is first search, and then other formats of online advertising. Google strived to make advertising more relevant and less disruptive, and strived to do this all with its Adwords solution.

    It has also been a success on Wall Street. Even though expectations were high, it blew past the estimates with its recent earnings announcement , growing the company at twice the growth rate of the growing online ad market.

    While Google has continued to have a hard time succeeding in China because of strong competition from Baidu, it is performing exceptionally well in other markets. Compared to their smaller local competitors, US companies continue to have a hard time succeeding in China. Nevertheless, Google continues to make inroads in China.

    When talking about large investment amounts, it is easy to forget that the most important part of the equation in brand-building is always people, not marketing dollars or yuan. Buying into Apple and Google would get an inside view into how these leading companies are run.

    So what is the best, the smartest way to buy into these companies?

    My guess is that the smartest way is to buy Apple and Google shares on the open market and gradually build up enough to get a board seat, where the sovereign wealth fund’s proxies could quietly learn how these companies perform, and find out who are the people who really make contributions to the company. Steve Jobs likes to create the persona that he is Apple and Apple is Steve Jobs, but the truth is not that simple.

    Be a smart passive investor, not a dumb active investor. Learn to walk before you run. While it may seem a longer, slower process in the beginning, this is actually the faster, smarter and more economical way to go. Can you think of another way where you earn money while you learn instead spending big chunks?

    So to sum up, the benefits of buying into Apple and Google are:

    • Great place to park those extra depreciating dollars and get some appreciation
    • Great way to learn how digital online products and brands are made
    • Great way to find out who the smart movers and shakers are
    • Great way to learn how to become a smart passive investor

    If the sovereign wealth fund is doing what they were set up to do, they are already buying Apple and Google shares.

    Now that would be real smart…




    6 Responses to “Another Way To Develop Global Chinese Brands: Buy Google, Apple”

    1. [...] admin put an intriguing blog post on Another Way To Develop Global Chinese Brands: Buy Google, AppleHere’s a quick excerpt [...]

    2. [...] The China Vortex wrote an interesting post today on Another Way To Develop Global Chinese Brands: Buy Google, AppleHere’s a quick excerpt Over the past few years, one subject has dominated Chinese thinking on the government and enterprise levels: how to take Chinese brands global. During the runup to the Beijing Olympics in 2008, and then the Shanghai Expo in 2010, this subject will become even more popular, as China’s economic power grows and the US’s economic dominance gradually [...]

    3. [...] came across this post – Another Way To Develop Global Chinese Brands: <b>Buy</b> Google, Apple – and thought it was worth sharing. I hope you find it interesting too and take the time to read [...]

    4. SEO in China says:

      Although the idea itself is good, the reality is there is no way for profitable and publicly-listed US companies to be acquired by Chinese companies or investment funds. It is not good for their branding, the Chinese management can’t add any value they haven’t got already, and it’s not good for the investors. So from a long term perspective the idea is just not workable.
      It is not just about the money. Hedge funds in the US or offshore are sitting on hundreds of billions of USD but it doesn’t mean they can just go and acquire Microsoft or Google.
      Patrick
      Shanghai

    5. [...] is what those who criticize the article about sovereign wealth fund stakes in Google and Apple don’t understand. When a corporation’s shares are traded on [...]

    6. Thanks for the informative post.. and thanks for adding our comment to the blog. I am subscribing to your feed so I don\’t miss the next post!